Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Zhou v. NextCure, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07772
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Chau Q. Khuong, Stella Xu and others
Plaintiff:
Ye Zhou
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant:
Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Zaerpour et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Soheil Zaerpour and The People of the United States of America
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank plc and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
UBS Group AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff:
Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant:
UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant:
Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Kaplan et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
as 1:2022cv01333
Petitioner:
Adam S Kaplan and Daniel E Kaplan
Respondent:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
In re American Capital Realties Litigation
as 1:2015cv00421
Defendant:
American Capital Realties Litigation, American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., Arc Properties Operating Partnership L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, College Retirement Equities Fund, Tiaa-Cref Equity Index Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Mustafin v. GreenSky, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11071
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley and Co. LLC, Guggenheim Securities, LLC, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rustam Mustafin
Petitioner:
The Fund Group, Inter-Local Pension Fund of the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Mitchell DeVivo and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Bradley Yu
Not Classified By Court:
TimesSquare Capital Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Lloyds Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff:
Putnam Bank
Consolidated Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Training Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Yu v. GreenSky, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Fifth Third Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Guggenheim Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Yu
Petitioner:
Luciano Felice and The Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
