Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Cotton v. Rhine et al
as 4:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Ronell Cotton
Defendant:
Leonard Rhine, Rifat Imdad, Monica Hasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Merritt v. Benton et al
as 5:2023cv06037
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Megan Benton, Thomas Fincham and Abe Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Fincham et al
as 5:2023cv06036
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Thomas Fincham, Abe Shaffer, Megan Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Marquart et al
as 5:2023cv06025
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Keith Marquart, Rebecca Spencer, Patrick Robb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Marquart et al
as 5:2022cv06133
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Keith Marquart, Rebecca Spencer, Patrick Robb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorman v. Brewer et al
as 4:2022cv00666
Petitioner:
Alan Gorman
Respondent:
Chris Brewer, Joe Biden, Merritt Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Merritt et al v. Missouri CVS Pharmacy, LLC
as 4:2021cv01027
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Merritt and Gary Merritt
Defendant:
Missouri CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez-Rogel v. Merritt, et al
as 3:2020cv05123
Interested Party:
Asa Hutchinson
Plaintiff:
Jose Gomez-Rogel
Defendant:
James Edward Merritt, Jr. and Liberty Fruit Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Merritt v. Mesmer
as 4:2020cv01238
Petitioner:
Sandra Merritt
Respondent:
Angela Mesmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merritt v. Payne et al
as 4:2019cv03101
Defendant:
Sharmila Suri, Corizon, LLC, Warden Stanley Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
