Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Metcalf v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff: Richard Metcalf
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Metcalf v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00247
Plaintiff: Alisa Metcalf
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
POOLE v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00166
Plaintiff: JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant: RON JAMES, Officer ROLLINS, PRESTON ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLATER v. THOMAS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2018cv00081
Plaintiff: JOSEPH CHANCE SLATER
Defendant: CARLTON POWELL, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, RON JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01975
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
HURST v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2017cv00191
Plaintiff: GREG DEWAYNE HURST
Defendant: VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, METCALF, RON JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalf et al v. Johnson & Johnson
as 1:2017cv03784
Plaintiff: Ann Metcalf and Scott Metcalf
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03559
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?