Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Holland v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland
Defendant:
Gary City of, Scott King, Hamilton Carmouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Methodist Hospitals Inc The et al
as 2:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mary L Smith
Defendant:
Methodist Hospitals Inc The and Doris Slusser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Methodist Hospitals Inc The v. FTI Cambio LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Methodist Hospitals Inc The
Defendant:
FTI Cambio LLC , Healthnet Systems Consulting Inc , Clifton Jay and others
Counter_claimant:
Medical Information Technology Inc
Counter_defendant:
Methodist Hospitals Inc The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BLOOMINGTON HOSPITAL, CLARIAN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Methodist Hospitals Inc The v. Woodrum Ambulatory Systems Development LLC
as 2:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
Methodist Hospitals Inc The, Methodist Hospitals Inc The and Methodist Hospitals Inc The
Defendant:
Woodrum Ambulatory Systems Development LLC and Woodrum Ambulatory Systems Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jannx Medical Systems Inc v. Methodist Hospitals Inc
as 2:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jannx Medical Systems Inc
Defendant:
Methodist Hospitals Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
