Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jenkins v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00634
Defendant: All Employees at DCSO, Daron Hall, 5 John Doe Sherrifs Deputys and others
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2018cv00100
Petitioner: Michael W Jenkins
Respondent: John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Hill
as 3:2017cv00251
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Jenkins
Defendant: Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Deitz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01111
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Jenkins
Defendant: Tamra Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Deitz et al
as 3:2017cv00881
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Jenkins
Defendant: f/n/u Deitz, f/n/u Soldo, f/n/u Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00375
Respondent: Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Petitioner: Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant: Judge James R. Ellis and Multnomah County
Plaintiff: Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Lindermood et al
as 3:2016cv03273
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Jenkins
Defendant: Cherry Lindermood, Lee Brewer, Brandon Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Amsberry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02314
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner: Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Beatty et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Defendant: Judge C. Beatty and Judge Mercedes F. Diez
Plaintiff: Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?