Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Triggs-Nunez
as 2:2022at01209
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Triggs-Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Triggs-Nunez v. Cates
as 2:2022cv02122
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Triggs-Nunez
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lena
as 4:2022cv04103
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lena v. Unknown
as 4:2022cv04092
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Koenig et al
as 4:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Powell
Defendant:
Craig Koenig and L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re Delta Air Lines, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00786
Plaintiff:
Frankie Lomas, Roxanda Yancor, S. P. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Y. C., Maria L. Rivera, Jose Frausto and others
Petitioner:
Rosa Santiago, Adrian B. Alvarez, Ivania Urrutia and others
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Doe 1 and Does 2 through 50, inclusive; From member case number: 2:22-cv-01589 JAK (SKx)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Powell v. Banales et al
as 4:2019cv06753
Defendant:
J. Jones and E Banales
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manocchio v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Manocchio
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Lena v. Becerra et al
as 3:2019cv00810
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Donald Specter and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lena v. Becerra et al
as 3:2019cv00561
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Donald Specter and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
