Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Ahern v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Ahern
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, Michael B. Mukasey and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edwards v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00062
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Carlos Edwards
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, Michael B. Mukasey and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gray v. Emerson et al
as 4:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Gray
Defendant:
William Emerson, Quicken Loans, Inc., Janice K. Huey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gray v. Emerson et al
as 4:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Gray
Defendant:
William Emerson, Quicken Loans, Inc., Janice K. Huey and others
Intervenor:
Gary-Mario Gray
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Halim et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv01238
Plaintiff:
Mohibullah Halim and Fouzia Halim
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gonzalez v. Toney et al
as 1:2008cv01166
Petitioner:
Jose Fernandez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Earnest Toney, Mary Loiselle, John P. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Singh v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv01087
Petitioner:
Sukhbir Singh and Sukhbir Singh
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael B. Mukasey, Mary F. Loiselle and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
