Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Gray v. City of New York
as 14-848
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Simpson Gray, Doctor
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Lynn Ameleh, Esq., individually
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Dpeartment of Education "Doe", Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York and others
Robinson v. Kelly
as 14-153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Robinson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Kelly, Commissioner, The New York City Police Department and Michael Bloomberg, Mayor, The City of New York, in their individual capacities
Floyd v. City of New York
as 13-3461
Plaintiff - Appellee:
David Floyd, Lalit Clarkson, Deon Dennis and others
Defendant:
New York City Police Officer Rodriguez, in his official capacity, New York City Police Officer Goodman, in his official capacity, New York City Police Officer Salmerson, Shield #7116, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Sergeants Benevolent Association
Floyd v. City of New York
as 13-3524
Plaintiff - Appellee:
David Floyd, Lalit Clarkson, Deon Dennis and others
Appellant:
Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc., Detectives' Endowment Association, Inc., NYPD Captains Endowment Association and others
Defendant:
New York City Police Officer Rodriguez, in his official capacity, New York City Police Officer Goodman, in his official capacity, New York City Police Officer Salmerson, Shield #7116, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Sergeants Benevolent Association
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York
Feelings v. City of New York
as 13-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Earl B. Feelings
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, P.O. Carl Caputo, 109 Precinct and Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City
Floyd v. City of New York
as 13-3088
Plaintiff - Appellee:
David Floyd, Lalit Clarkson, Deon Dennis and others
Defendant:
New York City Police Officer Rodriguez, in his official capacity, New York City Police Officer Goodman, in his official capacity, New York City Police Officer Salmerson, Shield #7116, in her official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York
Marcel v. United States of America
as 12-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Marcel, as Parent and Legal Custodian of Shaniya Heaven Marcel, Jr. also known as Daniel Marcel, infant Ruth OnalishaRodgriguez Marcel, also known as Ruth Marcel and formerly known as Baby Girl Pullin
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, State of New York, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York, in his personal and official capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
William Baccaglini, AKA Bill Baccaglini and Jeremiah James Quinlan
Bastidas v. City of New York
as 12-4457
Plaintiff:
Laurie Schoeman and Jerel Caspar
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Betty Bastidas, Gregg Ross, Jerel Walden and others
Defendant:
Perez, Police Officer, Beatty, Police Officer and David Cohen, Deputy Commissioner for Intelligence, New York City Police Department
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, James Essig, Police Inspector, Lorenzo Johnson, Police Captain and others
Crotty v. The City of New York
as 12-4480
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Emilia Crotty, Naomi Podber, Heather Blackburn and others
Defendant:
Kavita Kulkarni, Thomas Purtell, Deputy Chief, Robert Martin, P.O. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The City of New York, The Hudson River Park Trust, John and Jane Does, Police Officers #1-50 Individually and in their official capacities, (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown) and others
Bell v. City of New York
as 12-4420
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cathie L. Bell
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, a municipal entity, Jose Perez, New York City Police Officer, individually, in his official capacity, John Doe, New York City Police Officer, individually, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
