Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Damion Bell v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1641
Petitioner:
DAMION LEMARR BELL
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
James Blaylock v. Michael Burgess, et al
as 24-1626
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANK, in their official and personal capacities, JEFFREY CLOUSE, Deputy Warden, in his official and personal capacities, [UNKNOWN] MCCALL, Resident Unit Manager, in their official and personal capacities and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LONNIE BLAYLOCK
Tompkins #518783 v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv00719
Respondent:
David A. Thompson, Jennifer Houke-Born, Michael Burgess and others
Petitioner:
Boston Jermaine Tompkins #518783
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Burgess
as 2:2024cv11796
Respondent:
Michael Burgess
Petitioner:
Willie Washington
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Darius SpencerIn re: Darius Spencer
as 24-1510
Petitioner:
In re: DARIUS DOMINIQUE SPENCER
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Petersmark #766394 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Defendant:
Unknown Cochrane, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark #766394
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Profit #389088 v. Rasmussen et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Defendant:
Unknown Bromley, Unknown Rasmussen, Unknown McShane and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bernard Profit #389088
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Cochrane and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Thomas Carter v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
THOMAS TYRONE CARTER
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
