Cases 1 - 10 of 21
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DOE #1, K. CRADDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CRAWFORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL and UNKNOWN NAMED TRUST FUND SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
LANGAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02524
Plaintiff:
DONNA LANGAN and PETER KEVIN LANGAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, ELIZABETH STAHL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02341
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Director MICHAEL CARVAJAL, IAN CONNOR and others
ROBINSON v. CARVAJAL
as 1:2021cv02157
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIORITO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Defendant:
BREWER, BOP GENERAL COUNSEL DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. FIORITO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALLARDO v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
JARED KUSHNER, ROSALIND BURNS-SARGENT, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff:
GARRY DAULD GALLARDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
