Cases 1 - 10 of 730
Kim v. Chertoff
as 1:2018cv00251
Defendant:
Secretary Michael Chertoff
Plaintiff:
Koo-Hyun Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ayala v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ayala
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, District Attorney's Office, District Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00973
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Ortega et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00401
Defendant:
CBP Does 1-15, Michael Chertoff, James T. Hayes, Jr. and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ortega and Ruben Dario Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. Clark et al
as 3:2011cv00319
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Neil Clark and Eric Holder, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
SARVJIT SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Case name not on file
as 1:2010cv00110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01442
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Huynh v. Thompson, et al
as 3:2010cv00087
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Garcia, Ponce Guerra and others
Petitioner:
Phuong Thanh Huynh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smart v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv00104
Petitioner:
Festus Smart
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Michael Chertoff and Kenneth Landgrebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
