Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Howard v. Gordon Law Offices, P.S.C. et al
as 4:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
Gordon Law Offices, P.S.C., Michelle Lynn Mattingly, Real Estate Appraisals & Consultants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Lamar et al
as 4:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
David W. Lamar, Daviess County, City of Owensboro, Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
Bob Wilkinson, Heather Losser, Jean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. White et al
as 5:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
Randy White, LaDonna Thompson, Ernie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael D. Howard
as 13-5959
Movant:
In re: MICHAEL DALE HOWARD
Respondent:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Howard v. White et al
as 5:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
Randy White, Heiher, Bob Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Payne et al
as 4:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
David C. Payne, Michael Spindler, Michelle Mattingly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Department of Corrections
as 4:2012cv00112
Petitioner:
Michael Dale Howard
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Glenn et al
as 4:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
Joe Glenn, Julia H. Gordon and David W. Lamar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 4:2011cv00053
Petitioner:
Michael Dale Howard
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
