Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Marc Norfleet v. John Stroger, Jr., et al
as 08-1066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC NORFLEET
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H. STROGER, JR., MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, NAGIB ALI and others
Favela v. Dart et al
as 1:2007cv05442
Petitioner:
Bibiano Favela
Respondent:
Thomas J Dart and Michael F. Sheahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Favela v. Sheahan et al
as 1:2007cv04638
Plaintiff:
Bibiano Favela
Defendant:
Michael F. Sheahan, Kathy Harris, Sgt. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2007cv04169
Plaintiff:
James Robertson
Defendant:
County of Cook, Michael F Sheahan, Officer Meriweather and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Singleton et al
as 1:2007cv04407
Plaintiff:
Marc Norfleet
Defendant:
Singleton, Nagib Ali, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cephas v. Sheahan et al
as 1:2007cv02430
Plaintiff:
Lenard S. Cephas
Defendant:
Michael F Sheahan, Godinez, Salazaar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Sheahan et al
as 1:2007cv01485
Plaintiff:
Rodney T McKinney
Defendant:
Michael F Sheahan, Glenn Trammell and Cook County Dept Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward et al v. Sheahan et al
as 1:2006cv07185
Plaintiff:
Perry Ward
Defendant:
Michael F Sheahan, Tom Dart, Mr Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Walker, Jr. et al
as 3:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ronzell Thomas
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., Melody J Ford, Billy Bryan Don and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
