Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Michael Garnett v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2023cv07442
Plaintiff:
Michael Garnett
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Thomas E. Perez vs. James Doyle, et al
as 2:2015mc00119
Defendant:
James Doyle, Michael Garnett, Cynthia Holloway and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Secretary United States Depart v. James Doyle, et al
as 15-1574
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY and PITWU HEALTH & WELFARE
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
MICHAEL GARNETT and MARK MACCARIELLA
Third Party:
DAVID WEINSTEIN, UNION PRIVILEGE CARE INC, DANTE GEORENO and others
Secretary US Dept of Labor v. James Doyle, et al
as 15-1380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendant - Appellant:
CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY
Defendant:
PITWU HEALTH & WELFARE
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
JAMES DOYLE, MICHAEL GARNETT and MARK MACCARIELLA
Third Party:
DAVID WEINSTEIN, UNION PRIVILEGE CARE INC, DANTE GEORENO and others
Third Party - Appellee:
NEAL GOLDSTEIN and FREEDMAN & LORRY
Richard Garnett, et al v. Wayne Longo, et al
as 11-35400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CALVERT GARNETT, ERIC MICHAEL GARNETT and DEBORAH JEAN GARNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE LONGO, CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE, COEUR D'ALENE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Secretary Labor v. James Doyle
as 10-3598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SECRETARY LABOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DOYLE, CYNTHIA HOLLOWAY, MICHAEL GARNETT and others
Garnett et al v. Longo et al
as 2:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Richard Calvert Garnett, Eric Michael Garnett and Deborah Jean Garnett
Defendant:
Wayne Longo, City of Coeur d'Alene, Coeur d'Alene Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
