Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Shavers et al
as 4:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tommie Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Shavers, Sierra Wilkes, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BASKIN v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2021cv00824
Defendant:
DAVID CANANADY, DARYL WEBB, TYRONE HENDRICK and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Sheriff John Wilcher, Dr. Vlasenko and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Kirkland, Michael Green, Rashad Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center and Sheriff John Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Green v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv01117
Petitioner:
James Michael Green
Respondent:
Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. USA
as 1:2014cv00952
Petitioner:
James Michael Green
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Porter et al
as 1:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Austin Garrick Smith
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Karen West, Kathryn M. Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Department of Corrections
as 0:2010cv61284
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrell v. Atlanta Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2010cv02315
Plaintiff:
Willie James Terrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Atlanta Judicial Circuit, City of Atlanta, Georgia Public Defenders Standards Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
