Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv11999
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv10385
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv13097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Michael Medina Portillo v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-2031
Respondent / Appellee:
TONY H. PHAM, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID HARDING WETMORE, Chief Appellate Immigration Judge of the Board of Immigration Appeals, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL MEDINA PORTILLO and MICHAEL STEVEN MEDINA PORTILLO
Medina Portillo v. Wolf et al
as 2:2020cv12730
Defendant:
Detroit Field Office Rebecca Adducci, David H Wetmore, Michael J Klinger and others
Petitioner:
Michael Medina Portillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv12234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Naresh Kumar v. DHS, et al
as 19-2404
Petitioner / Appellant:
NARESH KUMAR
Respondent:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL J. KLINGER, District Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Detroit Field Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv12304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
