Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pitch Inc v. MJ Warren Enterprises Inc et al.
as 2:2016cv00972
Defendant:
MJ Warren Enterprises Inc and Michael John Warren
Plaintiff:
Pitch Inc
Michael Warren v. Robert Quada, et al
as 12-20397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT QUADA, Law Librarian, JANIS SCOTT, Mailroom Supervisor, TONY O'HARE, Assistant Warden and others
Warren v Quada et al
as 4:2012cv00606
Plaintiff:
Michael John Warren
Defendant:
Robert Quada, Janis Scott, Tony O'Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Warren v. Rissie Owens, et al
as 10-20315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSIE OWENS, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Chairwoman, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, THOMAS G FORDYCE, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Member, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and GERALD GARRETT, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Member, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Warren v. Owens et al
as 4:2009cv03758
Plaintiff:
Michael John Warren
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Thomas Fordyce and Gerald Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Owens et al
as 7:2009cv00114
Petitioner:
Michael John Warren
Respondent:
Rissie Owens, Thomas Fordyce and Gerald Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Quarterman
as 08-10617
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN WARREN
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Warren v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00170
Petitioner:
Michael John Warren
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00770
Petitioner:
Michael John Warren
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
