Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-20185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Van Overdam
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael K. Young, In his official capacity, Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity and others
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-90008
Respondent:
Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity, Texas A & M University and others
Petitioner:
Austin Van Overdam
Eustice v. Texas A & M University
as 21-20012
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas A & M University and Michael K. Young
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Eustice
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Young
as 4:2020cv02913
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Young K. Michael and Michael K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kamme O v. Texas A&M University & System, et al
as 20-20183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAMME O
Defendant / Appellee:
KAYE BALL, MICHAEL K. YOUNG, TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AND SYSTEM and others
Christopher Eustice v. Texas A & M University, et al
as 19-20457
Defendant / Appellee:
TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY and MICHAEL K. YOUNG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER EUSTICE
Byrne v. Young et al
as 4:2019cv01949
Defendant:
J Michael Ragan, Michael K Young and John Doe Texas A&M University Police Officers #1-4
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Byrne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ferguson v. Byington et al
as 4:2018cv03318
Defendant:
Carrie Byington and Michael K Young
Plaintiff:
Laura E Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Young
as 4:2018cv01547
Defendant:
Michael K Young
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hargrove v. Texas A&M University et al
as 4:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Darel Hargrove
Defendant:
Texas A&M University, Michael K. Young and Teresa Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
