Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PLATT v. PETERS et al
as 1:2022cv05717
Petitioner:
DERRICK LEVON PLATT
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KNIGHT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2022cv04223
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KNIGHT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Markell et al
as 1:2015cv01184
Plaintiff:
Shamsidin Ali
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Robert Coupe, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff:
Idris Young, Ernest Parson, Michael Manley and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardwick v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Hardwick
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
