Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Jewell et al
as 1:2013at00545
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant: Sally Jewell, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Jewell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01232
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant: Sally Jewell , U.S. Department of the Interior , U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor_defendant: Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations , Institute for Fisheries Resources and Yurok Tribe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Environmental Protection Information Center v. Lehr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02293
Plaintiff: Environmental Protection Information Center
Defendant: Stafford Lehr , Charlton H. Bonham , Sally Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States Department of the Interior, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03112
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
v. Interior et al
as 2:2012at01637
Defendant: Department of the Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2011at00343
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. United States Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00952
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant: United States Department of Interior , Kenneth Lee Salazar , United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Save San Francisco Bay Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2010at00181
Plaintiff: Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority, Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority and Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. US Dept. of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00357
Plaintiff: Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority, Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority and Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. US Dept. of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00712
Plaintiff: Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior , Kenneth Lee Salazar , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor_defendant: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?