Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(HC) Littleton v. Biden
as 2:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Michael Littleton
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PS) Littleton v. Residents et al
as 2:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
Residents, Internet, Gary Timmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Littleton v. Sacramento CA, et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
Sacramento California and Internet Scammers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Littleton v. Sacramento County Jail
as 22-70158
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LITTLETON
Respondent:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL
(HC) Littleton v. Sacramento County
as 2:2022cv01159
Petitioner:
Michael Littleton
Respondent:
Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Littleton v. Montiez et al
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
Mark Montiez, Melody Sanders, Anna Treystov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Littleton v. Fickenworth Pena et al
as 2:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
Alexis Fickenworth Pena, Roquel Pina, Raymond Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Littleton v. Montiez et al
as 2:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
Mark Montiez, James Montiez, Janea Herrea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Littleton v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
County of Sacramento and UC Davis Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LITTLETON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LITTLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
