Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Martin v. Saint Agnes Medical Center
as 1:2024at00387
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Saint Agnes Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Martin v. Saint Agnes Medical Center
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Saint Agnes Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021at01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Martin v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2020cv04293
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. USA
as 4:2020cv01951
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kustom Cycles, Inc. et al v. Dragonfly Cycle Concepts, LLC et al
as 2:2019mc00185
Defendant:
Kevin Michael Martin, Dragonfly Cycle Concepts, LLC, a California limited liability company and Dragonfly Cycle Concepts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kustom Cycles, Inc., a South Dakota corporation d/b/a Klock Werks Custom Cycles, Brian Klock, Kustom Cycles, Inc. and others
(HC) Martin v. Thompson
as 2:2019cv01492
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Petitioner:
Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
