Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Kinard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2022cv03889
Plaintiff:
Keaston D'Ahja Kinard
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, C. Holbrook, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Scott v. Stirling et al
as 5:2021cv00934
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Colie L Rushton and others
Plaintiff:
JQuan M Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Griffin v. Tisdale et al
as 0:2020cv04419
Defendant:
Cecilia Reynolds, John Doe, Rudy Tisdale and others
Plaintiff:
EX REL- Terrance Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Stirling et al
as 9:2019cv02283
Defendant:
Jones, Nance, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Michael Stokes v. Bryan P. Stirling et al
as 9:2019cv01992
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant:
Sharon Sims, Michael McCall, Wanda Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koon v. McCall et al
as 4:2019cv00406
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland Koon, Robert H Koon and Robert Koon
Defendant:
Chaplin Barber, Ofc. Collier, Lt. Robyn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweat v. Brian Sterling et al
as 2:2019cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat and Jeremy Sweat
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Michael McCall and Brian Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Stirling et al
as 9:2018cv03130
Defendant:
Core Civic of America, Michael McCall, Bryan P Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bronson Shelley v. Bryan P. Stirling, et al
as 4:2018cv02637
Defendant:
Patrick R. Jones, Officer Quick, Lt. Marlon Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Bronson Shelley, #1589035
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ackbar v. McCall et al
as 4:2018cv01581
Plaintiff:
Supreme Raheem Ackbar
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Shirley McCants, Donnie Stonebreaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
