Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mills v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLS
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Callahan v. Unified Govt of Wyandotte, et al
as 14-3171
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATRICK E. CALLAHAN
Consolidated Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK GAMBRILL, JEFFERY GARDNER, TRUNG HOANG and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY AND KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN and others
Objector:
ALLISON A. ARMSTRONG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JEROME GORMAN
Mills v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/City of Kansas City et al
as 2:2014cv02408
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County/City of Kansas City , Rick Armstrong , James Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdsong et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS et al
as 2:2013cv02090
Plaintiff:
Jerome Birdsong and Rocio Dominguez
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS , P. J. Locke , Travis Toms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gambrill et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/City of Kansas City et al
as 2:2011cv02699
Plaintiff:
Mark Gambrill , Jeffrey Gardner , Trung Hoang and others
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County/City of Kansas City, Rick Armstrong, James Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Alexander et al
as 2:2007cv00288
Plaintiff:
Dameon Demarco Edwards
Defendant:
Britney Alexander, Michael Mills, Leslie Blackham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
