Cases 41 - 50 of 200
Miles v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miles
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Michael Minev, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sam McFarland v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-17016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM MCFARLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MD MICHAEL MINEV, DR. HANF and others
Shawn Flynn v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN FLYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, ROMEO ARANAS and others
Esteban Hernandez v. Howell, et al
as 22-16922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN HERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWELL, warden, ARANAS, Dr., JAMES DZURENDA and others
Willie Smith v. Dawn Jones, et al
as 22-16913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN JONES, KELLY LYON, DON ADAMS and others
Banasiak v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Joshua N. Banasiak
Defendant:
Taneesha Cook, Michael Minev, Hanf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01969
Plaintiff:
Terence Fair
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Governor Sisolak, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. HDSP Dental Department et al
as 2:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Toney Anthony White, III
Defendant:
HDSP Dental Department, Calvin Johnson, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capri v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Richard Capri
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Charles Daniels, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Wade et al
as 3:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Wade, Dr Adamson, Michael Minev and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
