Cases 21 - 30 of 376
Edmon Gasaway v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv01711
Plaintiff:
Edmon Gasaway
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Mukasey, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gomis v. Murry et al
as 5:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
Anthony S. Murry, Alberto R. Gonzales, Thomas Ward Hussey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leigh-Davis Glass v. Tereser A. Banks et al
as 8:2008cv01197
Respondent:
Tereser A Banks, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Michael Mukasey
Petitioner:
Leigh-Davis Glass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Burns v. Mukasey, et al
as 2:2009cv00497
Plaintiff:
Dwayne B. Burns
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., City of Redding and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00974
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00851
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
26 California Bazar, Inc. et al v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2009cv00871
Plaintiff:
26 California Bazar, Inc. and Isabelita E Ramilo
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00197
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
