Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Murphy v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00591
Petitioner:
Michael Murphy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Murphy v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
as 3:2012cv00747
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy v. Teamsters Union Local 542 et al
as 3:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Teamsters Union Local 542, Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillip Zaragoza, et al v. Karen Bennett-Haron, et al
as 12-15015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP ZARAGOZA, MICHAEL FRANCO and PETER KRUSE, individuals
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN P. BENNETT-HARON, Judge, P. MICHAEL MURPHY, Coroner and CHRISTOPHER J. LAURENT, Chief Deputy DA
Zaragoza et al v. Bennett-Haron et al
as 2:2011cv01091
Defendant:
Judge Karen P Bennett-Haron, Chief Deputy DA Christopher J Laurent and Coroner P Michael Murphy
Plaintiff:
Michael Franco, Peter Kruse and Phillip Zaragoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Coastal Recovery Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv02567
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Coastal Recovery Corporation and Steven A. Antico
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy et al v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 3:2010cv04815
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy and Fawnda Murphey
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Hunt & Henriques
as 3:2010cv02136
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Hunt & Henriques
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
