Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. Paschal
as 24-968
Defendant:
MICHAEL PASCHAL and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shaquille Jenkins v. Augusta State Medical Prison, et al
as 24-10395
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE RASHAD JENKINS
Defendant:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON, GREEN, SCREWS and others
Jenkins v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Rashad Jenkins
Defendant:
Audwon Green, La'quenah Jackson, Michael Paschal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06253
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASCHAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
White v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome White
Defendant:
Latasha Harris, Sgt. T'onnie Lane, Warden Edward Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33022
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASCHAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PASCHAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25735
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASCHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PASCHAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21353
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASCHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Amerson v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 20-11179
Defendant / Appellee:
HANCOCK SP WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KANDI STEPHENS, CO2 Officer, Hancock State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEE AMERSON
AMERSON v. DOZIER
as 5:2018cv00376
Defendant:
SGT SERRIA HARRISON, KATHERINE WELLS, SGT FREDRICK WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
