Cases 1 - 6 of 6
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1390
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY LOCHRIDGE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, TIMBER HILL LLC and others
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1324
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURA POTTER, CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMBER HILL LLC
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1218
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Defendant:
VALUEACT HOLDINGS LP, VALUEACT COINVEST MASTER FUND LP, VALUEACT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMBER HILL LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 481 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN AND TRUST and others
Bahaa Aly, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Inter, et al
as 19-3326
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT L. ROSIELLO, HOWARD B. SCHILLER, DEBORAH JORN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA DAVIS, ERINCH OZADA, BAHAA ALY and others
Charles Monroe v. Deputy Warden, et al
as 13-3202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN, NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff-Lt., MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer and others
Charles Monroe v. Christopher Klein, et al
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff, MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer, BENSON, Staff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
