Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Juste v. DHS Buffalo Federal Facility et al
as 9:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
DHS Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Michael Phillips, Tryon Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juste v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andre Juste
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Loretta E. Lynch, Michael Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Tryon et al
as 6:2015cv06623
Plaintiff:
Edson Flores
Defendant:
Todd L. Tryon, Michael Phillips, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owusu v. Phillips et al
as 6:2015cv06551
Plaintiff:
Patrick Owusu
Defendant:
Michael Phillips, Todd Tryon, Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Phillips
as 1:2015cv03093
Petitioner:
Lynden B. Johnson
Respondent:
Michael Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canas v. Phillips et al
as 1:2014cv00928
Plaintiff:
Cesar Canas
Defendant:
Michael Phillips, Tryon and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nji v. Talton Communications, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv06449
Plaintiff:
Njasang Nji
Defendant:
Talton Communications, Inc., Julius Talton, Jr., James Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nji v. Valade et al
as 6:2014cv06096
Plaintiff:
Njasang Nji
Defendant:
Valade, Todd Tryon, Michael Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Martinez v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv00838
Petitioner:
Miguel M. Garcia-Martinez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Walter M. Ingram, Michael Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rasheed v. Tryon et al
as 6:2013cv06311
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Rasheed
Defendant:
Todd Tryon, Michael Phillips, Lieutenant Spiotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
