Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shawn Powell v. Warden
as 21-1493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN
In re: Shawn Powell
as 20-1008
Respondent:
SCOTT FINLEY
Petitioner:
In re: SHAWN MICHAEL POWELL
Not Yet Classified:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
Powell v. Finley
as 3:2019cv01931
Petitioner:
Shawn Michael Powell
Respondent:
Scott Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
POWELL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv17226
Petitioner:
MICHAEL POWELL
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
POWELL v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv03321
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2016cv04428
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, CHARLES ELLIS, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALTA et al v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05607
Plaintiff:
CARLOS PERALTA , ZAHEER ALI , JOHN ANTHONY and others
Defendant:
ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC. , AEGIS FUNDING CORPORATION, AMERICAN FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POWELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48328
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
POWELL et al v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv01745
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWELL and MELANIE CANCELI
Defendant:
HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION and SERGEANT'S PET CARE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. POWELL et al
as 2:2007cv00878
Petitioner:
PARISH KING
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWELL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
