Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08621
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15888
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Fuqua #215717 v. Unknown Party
as 3:2022cv08018
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv02337
Defendant:
Unknown Horn, Unknown Troman, Unknown Gonzelez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv01379
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Unknown Raak, D Webster, Unknown Higuera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Fuqua v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-15597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director of ADC Central Office, CAMIT, Correctional Officer II at Special Management Unit #1, FRANCISCO, CO III at SMU #1 and others
Fuqua #215717 v. Moody et al
as 2:2015cv01298
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Twyford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00286
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Unknown Cambit, Unknown Fransicco, Unknown Sterns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. Baquet
as 3:2011cv08000
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Sue K Baquet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
