Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gumns et al v. Edwards et al
as 3:2020cv00231
Plaintiff:
Julius Allen, Daniel Gumns, Ernest Rogers and others
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, John Morrison, Stephen R. Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2014cv00066
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00531
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
Rick C. Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00514
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
Director Rick C. Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2010cv00140
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director, TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Rick Thaler, Director, TDCJ - CID
as 2:2010cv00141
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director, TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Robinson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-50285
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Robinson v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00085
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Rick Thaler, Director, TDCJ - CID
as 5:2010cv00003
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director, TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2009cv01477
Plaintiff:
Leroy Brown, Jr
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Jerry Goodwin, Earl Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
