Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROHR v. BROWN
as 4:2013cv00148
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
AARON MICHAEL ROHR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. GMR Builders, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00416
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
GMR Builders, Inc. , Christopher Rohr , Michael Rohr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Barber et al v. Royal Stone Erectors, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Barber, Thomas F. Denk, Rick J. Semersky, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Royal Stone Erectors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber et al v. Gallagher Masonry, Inc.
as 5:2008cv01417
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
Gallagher Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber et al v. Onex Construction, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01413
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
Onex Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber et al v. Martina Marble Company
as 1:2008cv01172
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
Martina Marble Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber et al v. Konstanzer Masonry, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01173
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Thomas F. Denk and others
Defendant:
Konstanzer Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Barber, et al v. Elliott Masonry Co., Inc.
as 1:2008cv00748
Plaintiff:
James Barber, James Barber, Rick J. Semersky, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Elliott Masonry Co., Inc. and Elliott Masonry Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barber v. Scotstone Inc.
as 1:2007cv00714
Plaintiff:
James Barber, Robert A Fozio, Michael Kelly and others
Defendant:
Scotstone Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
