Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Kokor, et al.
as 1:2015cv00861
Plaintiff:
Horace Mann Williams
Defendant:
Winfred Kokor, M.D., James Jackson, Goodwin Ugwueze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Sepulveda et al
as 5:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Michael Sepulveda and Darin Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Williams v. Tabbaa Mumtaz, et al
as 12-16317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TABBAA MUMTAZ, Doctor, N. KUSHNER, Doctor, R. MUHAMMAD, Doctor and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRIN BRIGHT, M.D., MICHAEL SEPULVEDA, M.D. and ROBIN RODRIGUEZ, Nurse
Donald Walker v. Donald Pom Pan, et al
as 12-15961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD POM PAN, M.D. (Orthopedic Surgeon), TIMOTHY FREIDERICHS, M.D. (Staff Physician & Surgeon), J. WALKER, M.D. (Chief Health Care) and others
Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2011cv02717
Plaintiff:
Gerald Righetti
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, Michael Evans, Charles Dudley Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Hedgpeth et al
as 3:2011cv02171
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl George
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, Michael Sepulveda and Y. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 5:2011cv01196
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peoples, Jr.
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cates, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Pan et al
as 3:2010cv01425
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Walker
Defendant:
Donald Pom Pan, Timothy Freiderichs, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodlow v. Stewart et al
as 3:2009cv05053
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Goodlow
Defendant:
Richard Stewart, Darrin Bright, Michael Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
