Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Smith v. Kuforiji et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Misty Forwe, Penny George, S. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. MEND Correctional Care
as 4:2020cv04274
Plaintiff:
Juwan Crawford, Eddie Rigsby, Michael Stromer and others
Defendant:
MEND Correctional Care
Interested Party:
Jerowimo Price, Jonathan Robinson, Adell L Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. The United States
as 3:2020cv50249
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. McKenzie
Defendant:
The United States, Jaclyn Rogers, Stephen E. Balogh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv04908
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, 454ngyu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Smith v. Engelage et al
as 3:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Frank Lawrence, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Reviewing Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, David Childers, Salvador Godinez and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Swalls
as 2:2018cv02318
Respondent:
Matthew Swalls
Petitioner:
Jared Michael Smith
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Hopper et al
as 3:2018cv02150
Defendant:
Lt. DeWeese, C/O Freeman, Warden Goins and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
