Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cech v. Sage We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00715
Petitioner: Michael Steven Cech
Respondent: Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05253
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PITCHER v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2017cv01305
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PITCHER
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY , RAYMOND BOYER , MICHAEL STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67709
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant: AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESSEX v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66435
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STEVENS ESSEX
Defendant: 3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS et al v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 5:2009cv80075
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STEVEN MORRIS, SR. and SHERRY M. MORRIS
Defendant: AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
THOMPSON et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv64659
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STEVEN THOMPSON and DEBRA LYNN THOMPSON
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BURNS v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2007cv61530
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STEVEN BURNS
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM INC, AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?