Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ford v. USA
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Ford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Henegar v. Medical Staff of Sullivan County Jail
as 2:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Henegar
Defendant:
Medical Staff of Sullivan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02247
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Respondent:
The United States of America and The State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickerson v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Nurse Crystal l/n/u, Nurse Leah l/n/u, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv02681
Plaintiff:
Mike Parsons and Michael Wayne Parsons
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01551
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Daniels
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniels v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01456
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Daniels
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murphy v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00049
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Murphy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parsons v. Daughtery et al
as 2:2016cv02411
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Respondent:
Billy Daughtery, J.T. "Pancho" Chumley, Joseph H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCullough v. Stanley et al
as 3:2015cv00795
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne McCullough
Defendant:
Tim Stavely and Sandra Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
