Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. Woods
as 1:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Myles Xavier Smith
Respondent:
Michael Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petty v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Garon Jaquez Petty and Gavon Jaquez Petty
Respondent:
Michael Wood, Steve Marshall and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2019cv00125
Petitioner:
Michael Woods
Respondent:
Warden, Bureau of Prisons, Chad Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Browner v. Grant et al
as 3:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Antonio Browner
Defendant:
Barbara Grant, Lisa Fountain, Homer Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Woods et al
as 4:2014cv02090
Plaintiff:
Bobby Barrett
Defendant:
Michael Woods and Matt Pete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Izell Rivers v. Warden, et al
as 12-16548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IZELL RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, MICHAEL WOODS, JR., Sgt CO2, MICHAEL DANLEY, Col and others
RIVERS v. PIPPEN et al
as 3:2012cv00480
Plaintiff:
IZELL RIVERS
Defendant:
ALLEN PIPPEN, MICHAEL WOODS , JR, MICHAEL DANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamel Thompson v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 12-10421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMEL DEANGELO THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORP. OF AMERICA, TODD THOMAS, in his individual and official capacity, PEGGIE COOPER, in her individual and official capacity and others
Rasheed v. Owens et al
as 5:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Rasheed
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Barry Goodrich, Jerry Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Goodrich et al
as 5:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant:
Barry Goodrich, Hobbs, Lolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
