Cases 11 - 20 of 198
Afiz v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Abdul Al-Hakeem Afiz
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbee v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Andrew T Barbee
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marron v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Vicente Roldan Marron
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv01584
Petitioner:
Keith Wright
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Afiz v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Abdul Hakeem Afiz and Miron Taylor
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Goodwin v. Michele Buckner
as 23-3503
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Goodwin
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, Warden, South Central Correctional Center
Johnson v. Buckner
as 2:2023cv04215
Petitioner:
Joanthony Johnson
Defendant:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Littleton v. Parson et al
as 6:2023cv03367
Plaintiff:
Davoyn Littleton and Dawoyn Littleton
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Missouri Probation and Parole Board, Michele Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitten v. Buckner et al
as 6:2023cv03352
Plaintiff:
Jacob Whitten
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Kenneth Leeder, Philip Tippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
