Cases 11 - 20 of 20
LeBlanc #333019 v. Michigan Reformatory
as 1:2015cv00583
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. LeBlanc #333019
Defendant:
Michigan Reformatory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Denhof v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 14-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY GENE DENHOF
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN, STATE OF, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of Prisons and others
In re: Jenard Spencer
as 14-1527
Movant:
In re: JENARD SPENCER
Respondent:
PAMELA WITHROW, Warden, Michigan Reformatory
Carl Hunter v. Michigan Reformatory, et al
as 13-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN REFORMATORY, Prison, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SAGINAW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, named as Saginaw Prison
Carl Hunter v. Michigan Reformatory, et al
as 13-1622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL HUNTER, USA & World Treasurer Trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN REFORMATORY, (RMI) Health Service, UNKNOWN FLOYD, Captain, UNKNOWN MUEZIN, LT and others
Carl Hunter v. MDOC, et al
as 13-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHIGAN REFORMATORY and MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD
Hunter #229916 v. Michigan Reformatory et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Michigan Reformatory, Saginaw Correctional Facility and Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Michigan Reformatory et al
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Michigan Reformatory, Unknown Floyd, Unknown Muezin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
MDOC, Michigan Reformatory, Michigan Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry #199594 v. Palmer et al
as 1:2008cv00925
Plaintiff:
Randall Jay Cherry #199594
Defendant:
Carmen Palmer, Michigan Reformatory, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
