Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Microsoft Corporation v. Recoup IT, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00998
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Recoup IT, Inc. and Peter Sobotta
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
KINBOOK, LLC v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv04828
Plaintiff:
KINBOOK, LLC
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. #1 CYBER DEPOT, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00597
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
#1 CYBER DEPOT, LLC, THOMAS BURICK and EDWARD MAHOLIC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
BRITTINGHAM et al v. SOC SECURITIES ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2010cv00780
Plaintiff:
DENISE BRITTINGHAM, BRITTINGHAM ASSOC., DREXZEL OWNER(S) EST. and others
Defendant:
SOC SECURITIES ADMINSTRATION, CRENSHAW COUNTRY, ETHICON INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00215
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ALEX SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRITTINGHAM et al v. MURRY'S DEGREE et al
as 2:2009cv05786
Plaintiff:
DENISE BRITTINGHAM
Defendant:
MURRY'S DEGREE, MT AIRY SEPTA STATION, PNC BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Microsoft Corporation v. Davis
as 1:2009cv02024
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Harold Davis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
PARKER v. YAHOO!, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02757
Plaintiff:
GORDON ROY PARKER
Defendant:
YAHOO!, INC. and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
AGERE SYSTEMS INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
as 2:2007cv01029
Plaintiff:
AGERE SYSTEMS INC., AGERE SYSTEMS INC., AGERE SYSTEMS INC. and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
