Cases 1 - 7 of 7
US v. Martinez-Candelaria
as 21-1440
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL MARTINEZ-CANDELARIA, a/k/a Miky
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD, Court Appointed Coordinating Discovery Attorney
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Vazquez-Martinez et al
as 3:2015cv03076
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Orlando Miguel Vazquez-Martinez, Ana Hilda Maldonado-Santiago and Conjugal Partnership Vazquez-Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
US v. Martinez
as 14-1584
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ, a/k/a Miguel Pache-Pache, a/k/a Miguel Pache, a/k/a Alejandro UNK, a/k/a Miguel Martinez-Martinez, a/k/a Javier Francisco Ortiz, a/k/a Miguel Angel Garcia, a/k/a Francisco Javier Felix, a/k/a Miguel Angel Martinez
Alejandro-Martinez, et al v. Ortiz-Vazquez, et al
as 11-2334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL L. ALEJANDRO-MARTINEZ, MARIA ANTONIA ORTIZ-SANTIAGO, BENJAMIN APONTE-DOMINGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE ORTIZ-VAZQUEZ, in his personal capacity and as Director of Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, JOSE F. ORTIZ-VAZQUEZ, in his personal capacity and as Director of Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, COMPANIA DE AGUAS DE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
Morales-Vazquez et al v. Perez-Martinez et al
as 3:2011cv01665
Defendant:
Miguel Perez-Martinez, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Perez-Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Julio A. Morales-Medina , Luz Gonzalez-Torres , Luz M. Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
