Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Gomez v. Garland
as 23-702
Petitioner: MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00058
Plaintiff: Miguel Angel Gomez
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Maria Del Refugio Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Miguel Gomez-Rodriguez v. William Barr
as 20-72330
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner: MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ-RODRIGUEZ
USA v. Miguel Gomez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-40108
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ
USA v. Miguel Gomez
as 16-56503
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ
Miguel Angel Gomez v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv03724
Petitioner: Miguel Angel Gomez
Respondent: United States of America
Gomez v. BHRC Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv06508
Plaintiff: Miguel Angel Gomez
Defendant: BHRC Corp. and Nasser Ghorchian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cisneros et al v. Schnipper Restaurant LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv06266
Plaintiff: Miguel Cisneros , Angel Ortiz , Autiquio Leon and others
Defendant: Schnipper Restaurant LLC , SRG1, LLC , Jon Schnipper and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miguel Angel Gomez v. J. Macdonald et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv01367
Respondent: Attorney General of the state of California, Delinda Harman and J MacDonald
Petitioner: Miguel Angel Gomez
Miscellaneou: Anthony David Urbano
Gomez v. Macdonald et al
as 3:2013cv01679
Petitioner: Miguel Angel Gomez
Miscellaneous_party: Anthony David Urbano
Respondent: J. Macdonald , Delinda Harman and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?