Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ronald Tipton et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ronald Tipton , Althea Louise Tipton , Ronald W Tipton Jr and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ronald Tipton, et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 13-80069
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RONALD TIPTON, a married couple, ALTHEA LOUISE TIPTON, a married couple, ALTHEA TIPTON, a married couple and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Rodriguez v. Holder
as 13-848
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Olivo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Rodriguez v. Holder
as 13-46
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Olivo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Ronald Tipton et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv02056
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, Aaipharma Inc, Aaipharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hermony Molz, Inge Molzahn, Julie Monaco and others
Petitioner:
Jerry Osborn
Olivo-Rodriguez v. Holder
as 12-1533
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Olivo-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 6:2010cv06596
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Olivo Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America and Paul Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Olivo Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America and Paul Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Novak
as 1:2009cv00733
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Olivo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Paul Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Olivo Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of New York, Philip F. Foglia and Chauncey G. Parker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
