Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Ward v. Beesley et al
as 1:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Garland Ward
Defendant:
John Doe, H. Beesley and Mike Ezell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2020cv00236
Defendant:
John Does, Bruce Evan Adult Detention Center, Jackson County and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Adam Delano Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrath v. Trauth et al
as 1:2020cv00237
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Jessica Pleasant, Mike Ezell, Unknown Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
John T. McGrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Moman et al
as 1:2019cv00948
Defendant:
Maria Moman and Mike Ezell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Rockie Dural Pickens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry Craig v. Reuben Fountain, et al
as 17-60243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LEE CRAIG
Defendant - Appellee:
REUBEN FOUNTAIN and MIKE EZELL
Craig v. Fountain et al
as 1:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Craig
Defendant:
Reuben Fountain and Mike Ezell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. County of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Shawn LaBarron Davis
Defendant:
County of Jackson, Mississippi, Mike Wright, Wendy Nevals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomlin v. Jackson County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Tomlin
Defendant:
Jackson County, Mississippi, Mike Wright, Wendy Nevals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Jackson County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Randall Alan Williams
Defendant:
Jackson County, Mississippi, Mike Wright, Wendy Nevals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Jackson County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Randall Alan Williams and Donald Edward Tomlin
Defendant:
Jackson County, Mississippi, Mike Wright, Wendy Nevais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
