Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Anthel Brown v. Mike Ferriter, et al
as 09-36140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHEL L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE FERRITER, MIKE MAHONEY, TOM WOOD and others
White v. 16th District Court et al
as 1:2009cv00165
Plaintiff:
Joel Miles White
Defendant:
16th District Court, Mike Ferriter, Lisa Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritchie v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2009cv00070
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Ritchie
Respondent:
Mike Ferriter and Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ritchie v. Batista et al
as 9:2009cv00177
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Ritchie
Respondent:
Mike Ferriter and Mike Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hirt v. Law et al
as 4:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Patrick Keith Hirt
Defendant:
Sam Law, Mike Mahoney, Mike Ferriter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahoney v. Schweitzer et al
as 6:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott Mahoney
Defendant:
Brian Schweitzer, Montana Department of Corrections, Mike Ferriter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKeon v. Ferriter et al
as 4:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Christopher A McKeon
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Elizabeth Rantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKeon v. Ferriter et al
as 9:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Christopher A McKeon
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Elizabeth Rantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lankford v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lankford
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Liz Rantz and Frank Raiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellenburg v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2009cv00049
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellenburg
Defendant:
Mike Mahoney, Mike Ferriter, Ross Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
