Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Richard Guzman et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv08689
Plaintiff:
Richard Guzman, Richard Alba, Edward Arca and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Steven Garcia v. County of Riverside Sheriff's Department
as 5:2016cv01381
Defendant:
J. Burke, County of Riverside Sheriff's Department, William Di Yori and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Garcia
WASHINGTON v. JUSTICE COURT LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2010mc00368
Petitioner:
JAN WASHINGTON
Respondent:
JUSTICE COURT LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP, TEMECULA RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER, TEMECULA RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT PRESIDING JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BELLE et al v. PRESIDING JUDGE et al
as 1:2010mc00319
Petitioner:
RODNEY BELLE, SR.
Respondent:
TEMECULA RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER, PRESIDING JUDGE, ROD PACHECO and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BELLE v. TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER & PRESIDING JUDGE/JUSTICE COURT LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2010cv00726
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BELLE, SR.
Defendant:
TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER & PRESIDING JUDGE/JUSTICE COURT LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP, ROD PACHECO, JOHN W. VINEYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BELLE v. TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT/NEVADA TOWNSHIP CPURT & COMMISSIONERS & PRESIDING JUDGES et al
as 1:2010cv00616
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BELLE, SR.
Defendant:
TEMECULA/RIVERSIDE/SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT/NEVADA TOWNSHIP CPURT & COMMISSIONERS & PRESIDING JUDGES, ROD PACHECO, JOHN W. VINEYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mary Bochum and Associates v. Rod Pacheco et al
as 2:2010cv01216
Defendant:
Josef Ackermmann, Katey Ankeny, Ms. Deborah Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Bochum and Associates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
