Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bey v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2021cv00030
Defendant:
New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, City of Charleston, Ryan Pasquini and others
Plaintiff:
Tyehimba Salim Grant Ama Bey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smalls v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2020cv02968
Defendant:
Andrew Sullivan, SRP 2001-6, LLC and Mikell R. Scarborough
Plaintiff:
Clifford M. Smalls
Jones v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2020cv02950
Plaintiff:
Alluette Karen Jones
Defendant:
Synovous Bank NBSC, Mikell R. Scarborough, SRP2011-6 LLC and others
Mack v. Wells Fargo Financial South Carolina, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03335
Defendant:
Carolina Richardson Glenn, Gregory Thomas Whitley, Bradford Meekin Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Demar Mack
Jones v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2019cv02901
Plaintiff:
Alluette Karen Jones
Defendant:
Andrew Michael Sullivan, Mikell R Scarborough, SRP 2011-6 LLC and others
Wilson v. Belgraier et al
as 2:2019cv02879
Defendant:
Douglas Warning, January O Hearn, Debra Etheridge and others
Plaintiff:
Catwana Michelle Wilson
Bowden v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2019cv00655
Defendant:
EAS Sensorense Inc, Mary Scarborough, Others Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Albertha Bowden
Mack et al v. Wells Fargo Financial South Carolina et al
as 2:2018cv01489
Plaintiff:
Vincent D Mack and Paula D Mack
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Financial South Carolina, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Caliber Home Loans Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 2:2013cv01918
Plaintiff:
Virgie P Walker
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Charleston, County of, Mikell R Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Moultrie et al v. Blankinship et al
as 2:2011cv01097
Plaintiff:
Harold G Moultrie and Dolly Moultrie
Defendant:
Allison Blankinship, Vanderbilt Mortgage, Joey Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
