Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PAPP et al v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
MIKO R PAPP and BRIAN PAPP
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., DARDEN CONCEPTS, INC. and DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. doing business as YARD HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mikos v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE et al
as 2:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mikos
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, STATE FARM, Plymouth Rock Assurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MIKOS v. CAMPOS-PORTILLO
as 2:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MIKOS
Defendant:
ASTUL CAMPOS-PORTILLO, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE, STATE FARM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DE JESUS v. MIKO et al
as 2:2021cv02073
Defendant:
ROSE MIKO, ROSEANN MIKO and ADRIANA MIKO
Plaintiff:
NAISHA DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MILLER v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2019cv03125
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
MIKOS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mikos v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02037
Plaintiff:
Donald Mikos
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
YOUNG v. KOLBEY et al
as 5:2011cv05301
Plaintiff:
JEHU WALTER YOUNG
Defendant:
THOMAS W. KOLBEY and PETER MIKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2009cv05772
Plaintiff:
DAVID TROY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, RONALD MIKO and CHRIS DINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIKO v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv62204
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. MIKO, RICHARD A. MIKO, RICHARD A. MIKO and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
